Seized by Christ

They are experiencing Christianity as joy and hope, having thus become lovers of Christ.

Tag: Human Nature

  • “My Truth” vs. Opinion vs. Universal Truth:

    A Clear Breakdown

    You’ve heard it everywhere: “That’s my truth.”It sounds humble and respectful, but it quietly does a lot of heavy lifting. Here’s a straightforward breakdown.

    1. What “My Truth” Actually Means

    “My truth” is often just a stronger way of saying “In my experience.”

    A person’s experience is real and subjective — it genuinely happened to them. But “my truth” goes further: it treats that personal experience and its interpretation as a form of truth that others are expected to affirm and not challenge.

    Example:

    “My truth is that all men are dangerous.” 

    This isn’t just sharing a feeling. It claims moral weight and often treats disagreement as invalidation. 

    It flows from relativism: truth is different for every person.

    2. What an Opinion Actually Is

    An opinion is humbler. It’s simply what you think or believe. It doesn’t demand agreement or protection.

    Examples:

    “In my opinion, pineapple belongs on pizza.”

    “I think Jordan Peterson is overrated.”

    Opinions can be challenged, discussed, or even proven wrong without it becoming personal.

    3. Universal Truth

    Universal truth describes objective reality — especially human nature and how human beings actually thrive. It stands beyond any one person’s experience and points to what works best in the long run for everyone.

    Example:

    “Marriage is a covenant between one man and one woman” (if you hold that as objectively true), or 

    “Regular prayer, fasting, and generosity form mature, integrated people.”

    These truths are discovered, not invented. They reflect how reality and human flourishing actually work, regardless of individual feelings.How They Play Out in Real Life

    • “My truth” often shuts down conversation: “That’s your truth, this is mine.”
    • “My opinion” keeps the door open: “That’s my view — what do you think?”
    • Universal truth invites alignment with reality: “This is how humans are designed to flourish.”

    Why This Matters

    In conversations about faith, morality, philosophy, and the Hero’s Journey, we assume there is a discoverable universal truth grounded in reality, reason, and Scripture. “My truth” language quietly undermines that by turning subjective experience into protected, unchallengeable truth.

    A Simple Test

    Next time someone says “my truth,” ask:

    • Are they describing a real experience? (That deserves to be heard.)
    • Are they claiming their interpretation of that experience is truth itself? (That’s where it slips into relativism.)

    Universal truth stands steady, outside of us. It describes human nature and the path to genuine flourishing — inviting everyone, quietly and equally, to align with it.

  • Human Nature:

    The Unchanging Hardware Inside Us All

    I recently had a deep chat with Grok that stuck with me. It felt like cracking open a big puzzle about why we humans act the way we do — and why old traditions still matter in our crazy modern world.

    Let me share the whole idea with you in plain words, like we’re just talking over coffee. At the heart of it is this simple truth: human nature doesn’t change. Our brains, feelings, and bodies are the same “hardware” that our ancestors had tens of thousands of years ago. We still crave status, love being part of a small group, reach for sweet or fatty food when it’s around, and handle short bursts of stress better than endless worry. Evolution wired us this way for life in the wild — not for smartphones and 24-hour news.

    Faith, myths, brain science, and even AI all point to the same thing: they show what happens when we run this old hardware in new environments.

    Myths warn us — break the deep rules and you crash (think hubris leading to a big fall, or betrayal tearing a tribe apart).

    Brain science measures the damage — too much loneliness spikes stress hormones, endless scrolling messes up our reward system.

    AI, trained on every story, book, and post humans ever made, simply spots the repeating patterns: some choices lead to happiness across every culture and time; others lead to misery.

    So where does tradition fit in?

    It’s the “software” — the living code we keep updating.Tradition isn’t some dusty old rulebook. It’s a bunch of smart patches built over generations through trial and error. It helps our fixed human nature deal with a changing world. Some patches work great and get copied because they bring peace, stronger families, or better health. Some are mistakes that only worked in one place or time and now slow us down. Slowly, culture sorts it out: good ideas spread, bad ones fade.

    That’s why traditions evolve, even if it feels slow compared to phones getting new updates every year. Look at history: Indigenous groups on the plains grabbed horses when they arrived and wove them into hunting, travel, and status — same old human drives, just smarter tools. Immigrants tweak family recipes with new ingredients but keep the heart of connection and identity alive.

    Here’s what makes this view so powerful: it connects everything. Myths tell the story. Brain science explains the wiring. AI holds up a fast mirror so we can see the patterns clearly. Together they help us spot two things:

    • Traditions that protect us from chaos (like rituals that give structure when life feels wild).
    • Places where modern life breaks us — our sweet tooth meets junk food, our need for close friends meets lonely cities and algorithms, our threat radar meets endless abstract worries.

    The result? Some traditions need a trim or a tweak. Others are “antifragile” — they actually get stronger when life gets hard. Think of Stoic ideas that line up with modern therapy, or community rhythms that keep our minds steady. AI doesn’t rewrite human nature. It just speeds up the feedback loop. It lets us test ideas faster: “When groups do X, Y happens 92% of the time.” We can keep the good old code and refactor the buggy parts for today’s world. Coming from an engineering mindset, this clicks perfectly. Tradition is like compiled experience — a low-pass filter that cuts out the noisy fads of the moment and keeps the deep signals that help us survive long-term. The risk comes when change happens too fast. Our cultural “patches” can’t keep up, and suddenly the old hardware starts flailing. That’s exactly what we see today with social media, hyper-processed food, and anonymous city life.Good traditions are the necessary friction in life.

    They give us constraints that force us to grow stronger. In my earlier piece “The Bridge That Doesn’t Help,” I talked about how removing all friction stops real growth. This Grok conversation made me see tradition in the same light: it’s the bridge that does help — because it makes us do the hard work of becoming better humans.

    So here’s the big question I’m left with: Are today’s efforts to tear down or “deconstruct” every old tradition really progress? Or are we just trying to smooth out the very friction that builds character and keeps our unchanging human spirit from spinning out of control?

    What do you think? Is tradition the wise old software we should maintain and gently update — or something we can safely delete in the name of “freedom”?

    Drop your thoughts below. I’d love to hear them.