Should We Expect the Homeless to Help Before They’re Fed?

We all want to help the poor. But what happens when help becomes a routine—something expected, no matter what? In this post, we look at a story from a soup kitchen and ask a hard question: Should charity expect effort in return?

---

*Q: When I worked at a soup kitchen, there were about 100 homeless people outside. Trash was all over the street. I asked, “Why not have them clean up before they get their free lunch?” The answer? There were seven soup kitchens within half a mile, and they’d just go to the next one instead. Many of the people looked well-fed. It made me wonder—should charity require something in return?

---

A: That’s a sharp and honest question—and a very important one. In today’s welfare society, unconditional aid has become the norm. Many institutions and charities give without asking for anything back. At first, this feels like kindness. But over time, it can cause real problems:

• It removes effort. When people know they’ll get help no matter what, some stop trying. Not all—but many.
• It removes dignity. Work—even small tasks—gives a person value and purpose. When we give without asking for anything, we may treat people as if they have nothing to offer.
• It removes responsibility. A community stays strong when everyone takes part. When some people always give and others only take, the system wears down.

Your suggestion—asking people to clean the street before lunch—is simple and fair. It offers food and a way to contribute. But as you saw, if other places ask for nothing, people will simply go where it’s easier. That’s human nature.

This is why real change often happens best at the local level, where smaller organizations, churches, or mutual aid groups can build relationships, not just routines. When people feel known and needed, they are more likely to respond with respect and effort.

---

So what’s the answer?

We need a model of charity that combines:

• Compassion (yes, help people in need)
• Dignity (trust that they can contribute)
• Accountability (expect something small in return)

This doesn’t mean turning people away who can’t work. But it does mean offering a better path to those who can. A simple job like picking up trash or helping in the kitchen can make a big difference—not just for the community, but for the person doing it.

---

Conclusion:

Free meals are good. But earned meals are better—not because they cost less, but because they mean more. The goal of charity should never be just to fill a stomach. It should be to help a person rebuild their life, step by step.

Written in collaboration with ChatGPT